Episode Overview
In this episode, we explore how countries behave remarkably like people in international relations, with a special focus on how we anthropomorphize complex nation-states by attributing human emotions, behaviors, and relationship dynamics to them. We examine that moment when you realize global politics is essentially high school drama but with nuclear consequences.
- The Anthropomorphism Phenomenon: That quirky tendency to describe entire countries as having feelings – “Russia’s feeling threatened,” “China’s pursuing its interests,” or “America wants to maintain its leadership position”
- Research-Backed Insights: Drawing from studies by Keynes, Gaddis, Barnett & Finnemore, Drezner, Pape, and others spanning decades of international relations theory
- Global “Adulting” Patterns: How different diplomatic relationships mimic human interactions – from passive-aggressive breakups (Treaty of Versailles) to the silent treatment (Cold War) to neighborhood property disputes (border conflicts)
Key Topics Explored
Diplomatic Relationships as Personal Drama
- Treaty of Versailles: History’s most passive-aggressive breakup agreement (Keynes, 1920; Sharp, 2018)
- The Cold War: Two superpowers giving each other the silent treatment for 40 years (Gaddis, 2006)
- The United Nations: A group chat where everyone’s notifications are on but responses are optional (Barnett & Finnemore, 2004)
Economic Interactions with Human Emotions
- Sanctions: The international equivalent of “I’m not inviting them to my birthday party” (Drezner, 1999; Pape, 1997)
- Trade Agreements: Countries “competing” and “protecting” economic interests like shoppers at a market (Gilpin, 2001; Rogowski, 1989)
- News Literacy: How headlines about “tensions rising” can mean anything from strongly worded letters to submarines (Jervis, 1976)
Territorial Issues as Neighborhood Disputes
- Border Conflicts: Countries fighting over invisible lines like arguing neighbors (Forsberg, 2003)
- South China Sea: The ultimate fence fight but with battleships (Kaplan, 2014)
- Ocean Claims: “My towel was here first” on an international scale (Hayton, 2014)
- Alliances: Complicated friend groups described as “partnerships” or “friendships” (Walt, 1987)
Why We Can’t Stop Seeing Countries as People
- We understand abstract concepts through concrete human experiences (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980)
- Mental shortcuts help us predict behavior and make moral judgments (Crawford, 2000)
- “States are people too” – not literally, but in how we understand them (Wendt, 1999)
References
- Barnett & Finnemore (2004) “Rules for the World”
- Crawford (2000) on emotions in world politics
- Drezner (1999) “The Sanctions Paradox”
- Forsberg (2003) on territory as social construct
- Gaddis (2006) “The Cold War: A New History”
- Gilpin (2001) on global political economy
- Hayton (2014) “The South China Sea”
- Jervis (1976) “Perception and Misperception”
- Kaplan (2014) “Asia’s Cauldron”
- Keynes (1920) “The Economic Consequences of the Peace”
- Lakoff & Johnson (1980) “Metaphors We Live By”
- Marks (2013) on Versailles Treaty myths
- Pape (1997) on why sanctions don’t work
- Rogowski (1989) “Commerce and Coalitions”
- Sharp (2018) “Versailles 1919”
- Walt (1987) “The Origins of Alliances”
- Wendt (1999) “Social Theory of International Politics”